From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mauller v. Dresner

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 27, 2000
24 S.W.3d 762 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76747

Filed: June 27. 2000.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HON. KENNETH M. ROMINES.

Kenneth J. Feld, 8460 Watson Road, Suite 213, St. Louis, MO 63119, for respondent.

Philip E. Prewitt, 1430 Cheshire Lane, St. Louis, MO 63119, for appellant.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Paul J. Simon, J., and James R. Dowd, J., concurring.


ORDER


Plaintiffs appeal the trial court's judgment for Respondent on Counts I, II, III, and IV of Plaintiffs' petition. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a brief memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Mauller v. Dresner

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 27, 2000
24 S.W.3d 762 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Mauller v. Dresner

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MAULLER and KATHERINE MAULLER, APPELLANTS, v. NONA LEE DRESNER, ET…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jun 27, 2000

Citations

24 S.W.3d 762 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)