From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maull v. Carbess Realty, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 15, 1960
28 Misc. 2d 588 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)

Opinion

December 15, 1960

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, WILLIAM T. O'CONNELL, J.

Isaac Kaplan and Nathan Steiner for appellants.

Donald Crichton for respondent.


While the record might well justify a judgment against the individual defendant, the Trial Justice throughout evinced such hostility toward the position of both defendants as to deny to them the fair trial to which they were entitled by law. Moreover, exhibits were erroneously admitted without proper foundation. The result may not stand; the interests of justice require a new trial.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellants to abide the event.

AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur; HOFSTADTER, J.P., concurs in result.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Maull v. Carbess Realty, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 15, 1960
28 Misc. 2d 588 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
Case details for

Maull v. Carbess Realty, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED MAULL, Respondent, v. CARBESS REALTY, INC., et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1960

Citations

28 Misc. 2d 588 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
208 N.Y.S.2d 500