Maulding v. Adams

Full title: MAULDING ET AL v. ADAMS ET AL

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Feb 16, 1966

410 P.2d 1023 (Or. 1966)

410 P.2d 1023

Opinion

Argued February 4, 1966

Affirmed February 16, 1966

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

PAUL R. HARRIS, Judge.

Ernest M. Jachetta, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was George L. Evans, Portland.

Donald H. Joyce, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Herman W. Winter, Heppner.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and GOODWIN, DENECKE,^_ HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.

_ Denecke, J., did not participate in this decision.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for damages for misrepresentation in the sale of a house and lot. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and the court found that the alleged misrepresentations had not been made.

Our examination of the record found evidence to support the trial court's findings. The question was one of fact.

Affirmed.