stating that "the Fifth Amendment does not bar the compelled production of all evidence merely because it is incriminating but bars only compelled testimonial communication that is incriminating"
Summary of this case from Swink v. Montgomery Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rsNo. 89-2366
August 20, 1991.
Appeal from the W.D.Mich.
REVERSED.
stating that "the Fifth Amendment does not bar the compelled production of all evidence merely because it is incriminating but bars only compelled testimonial communication that is incriminating"
Summary of this case from Swink v. Montgomery Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rsapplying Michigan law
Summary of this case from In re Valve Timing Control Devices Dealerapplying Michigan law
Summary of this case from In re Auto. Parts Antitrust Litig.Full title:Mattner v. Tom A. Jennaro Associates
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: Aug 20, 1991
Id. at 627. Though "nothing in the Constitution requires a civil action to be stayed in the face of a pending…
Weigandt v. Woodcock"Civil and criminal actions may be brought either simultaneously or successively and there is no requirement…