From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Watson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 15, 2012
NO. 3:11-1093 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 15, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3:11-1093

03-15-2012

GEORGE W. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. NICK WATSON, L.P.D., Defendant.


Judge Haynes/Bryant

Jury Demand

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed his "Motion Requesting the Court to Order All Relevant Documents Be Given to Plaintiff" (Docket Entry No. 9).

Plaintiff's motion is unsigned and therefore fails to comply with Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Moreover, plaintiff's motion fails to demonstrate that plaintiff has previously requested discovery of the documents and other information he seeks pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's motion requesting the Court to order all relevant documents be given to plaintiff (Docket Entry No. 9) is DENIED without prejudice to plaintiff's right to seek discovery of relevant information pursuant to the provisions of the federal rules.

It is so ORDERED.

John S. Bryant

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Matthews v. Watson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 15, 2012
NO. 3:11-1093 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Matthews v. Watson

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE W. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. NICK WATSON, L.P.D., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 15, 2012

Citations

NO. 3:11-1093 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 15, 2012)