From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 22, 2015
604 F. App'x 283 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-6132

05-22-2015

ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, and RYAN FAULCONER, AUSA; CARLA COOPWOOD, U.S. Probation Officer; BENNETT BROWN, Attorney; CHRISTINE WINDNESS, FBI Special Agent; JOHN DOE, Unknown Agent of Maryland State Attys. Office; JANE DOE, Unknown named agents of Maryland State Attys. Office; MICHAEL PAUZE, AUSA; ALICIA WOJTKONSKI, FBI Special Agent; ROD ROSENSTEIN, in His Official Capacity; NEIL MCBRIDE, in His Official Capacity; DISTRICT OF MARYLAND US ATTORNEYS OFFICE, in its Official Capacity; EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA (ALEXANDRIA) US ATTORNEYS OFFICE, in its Official Capacity; BENNETT BROWN, in his Individual Capacity; RYAN FAULCONER, In his Individual Capacity, Defendants.

Alexander Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Ayana Niambi Free, Assistant United States Attorney, Sosun Bae, Andrew Sun Han, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O'Grady, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01473-LO-TCB) Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alexander Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Ayana Niambi Free, Assistant United States Attorney, Sosun Bae, Andrew Sun Han, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alexander Matthews appeals the district court's order granting the United States' motion to dismiss his Federal Tort Claims Act suit for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v. United States, No. 1:12-cv-01473-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Jan. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Matthews v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 22, 2015
604 F. App'x 283 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Matthews v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 22, 2015

Citations

604 F. App'x 283 (4th Cir. 2015)