From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Township of Woodbridge

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 2, 1936
187 A. 374 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Submitted May 29, 1936 —

Decided October 2, 1936.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 14 N.J. Mis. R. 143.

For the respondent, Matthew F. Melko.

For the appellant, William P. Braun.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Matthews v. Township of Woodbridge

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 2, 1936
187 A. 374 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

Matthews v. Township of Woodbridge

Case Details

Full title:AUGUST MATTHEWS, RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 2, 1936

Citations

187 A. 374 (N.J. 1936)
187 A. 374

Citing Cases

North Wildwood v. Cirelli

We do not understand that an accident, to arise out of an employment, must be such as could not have happened…

Mixon v. Kalman

For instance in Kauffeld v. G.F. Pfund Sons, supra, the employee died from thermic fever or sun stroke, and…