From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Huwe

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 4, 1923
143 N.E. 610 (Ohio 1923)

Opinion

Nos. 17991 and 17992

Decided December 4, 1923.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.

Mr. Mortimer Matthews, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Charles S. Bell, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Chester S. Durr, assistant prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.


It appearing to the Court that this cause was filed as of right, and that the record presents no debatable constitutional question, it is ordered that the petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.

Petition in error dismissed.

WANAMAKER, ROBINSON, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ALLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matthews v. Huwe

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 4, 1923
143 N.E. 610 (Ohio 1923)
Case details for

Matthews v. Huwe

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEWS v. HUWE, TREASURER. MATTHEWS ET AL. v. HUWE, TREASURER

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 4, 1923

Citations

143 N.E. 610 (Ohio 1923)
143 N.E. 610