From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Dec 4, 2014
Case No. 8:13-cv-1469-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Dec. 4, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 8:13-cv-1469-T-33TGW

12-04-2014

GARRY MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson (Doc. # 27), entered on November 10, 2014, recommending that Plaintiff's Petition for Attorney Fees (Doc. # 19) be granted to the extent that Plaintiff is to be awarded $5,432.00 in attorneys' fees to be paid to Plaintiff's counsel by the Defendant pursuant to the EAJA, if Plaintiff is not indebted to the United States Department of the Treasury.

On November 28, 2014, Plaintiff filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. # 28). Thereafter, Defendant filed a response to Plaintiff's objection on December 3, 2014. (Doc. # 29). After due consideration, the Court overrules Plaintiff's objection and adopts the Report and Recommendation of Judge Wilson. Discussion

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983).

In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Hous. v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

Upon due consideration of the entire record, the Court overrules Plaintiff's objection and adopts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Court agrees with Judge Wilson's detailed and well-reasoned findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Report and Recommendation thoughtfully addresses the issues presented and the objection does not provide a basis for rejecting the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) The Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Thomas G. Wilson, United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 27) is ADOPTED. (2) Plaintiff's Petition for Attorney Fees (Doc. # 19) is GRANTED in the amount of $5,432.00 as set forth herein.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 4th day of December, 2014.

/s/_________

VIRGTNIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Matthews v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Dec 4, 2014
Case No. 8:13-cv-1469-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Dec. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Matthews v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:GARRY MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Dec 4, 2014

Citations

Case No. 8:13-cv-1469-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Dec. 4, 2014)

Citing Cases

Goodman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Fees for time spent preparing an EAJA request are allowed. Jean, 863 F.2d at 779-80. Fees for time spent…