From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Betsinger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jul 27, 2018
Case No. 3:18-cv-026 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 27, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 3:18-cv-026

07-27-2018

Anthony Matthews, Plaintiff, v. Randy Betsinger, et al., Defendants.


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE NEWMAN (DOC. 20) THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (DOC. 18) BE DENIED.

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman, (Doc. 20), that recommends that Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. 18) be denied.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is correct. Wherefore, the Court ADOPTS Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman, (Doc. 20), and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. (Doc. 18).

DONE and ORDERED this Friday, July 27, 2018.

s/Thomas M. Rose

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Matthews v. Betsinger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jul 27, 2018
Case No. 3:18-cv-026 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Matthews v. Betsinger

Case Details

Full title:Anthony Matthews, Plaintiff, v. Randy Betsinger, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jul 27, 2018

Citations

Case No. 3:18-cv-026 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 27, 2018)

Citing Cases

Matthews v. Betsinger

The undersigned has liberally construed Matthews's original complaint to assert alleged constitutional…