From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Zuckerman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 1, 1967
19 N.Y.2d 977 (N.Y. 1967)

Opinion

Argued May 17, 1967

Decided June 1, 1967

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.

Leonard Feldman for Landon Zuckerman, appellant.

Emanuel Redfield for Sam Haber, appellant.

Harold M. Spitzer for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. The reversal by the United States Supreme Court of the orders in these disciplinary proceedings, with remand to the Appellate Division, leaves room for interpretation. Consequently due process required notice to appellants and opportunity to be heard before the determinations were made by the Appellate Division culminating in the order of suspension entered March 20, 1967, from which this appeal is taken.

The order appealed from should be reversed and the matter remanded to the Appellate Division for further consideration upon notice to appellants and after they shall have had opportunity to be heard as above mentioned.

Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL concur.

Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.


Summaries of

Matter of Zuckerman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 1, 1967
19 N.Y.2d 977 (N.Y. 1967)
Case details for

Matter of Zuckerman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LANDON ZUCKERMAN and SAM HABER, Attorneys, Appellants…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 1, 1967

Citations

19 N.Y.2d 977 (N.Y. 1967)
281 N.Y.S.2d 523
228 N.E.2d 693

Citing Cases

People v. Burgos

Furthermore, when discussing "serious and substantive" defects that would render counsel unlicensed, the…

People v. Burgos

Furthermore, when discussing "serious and substantive" defects that would render counsel unlicensed, the…