Summary
In Yevoli the rule was broad enough to cover candidates for judicial office, although the case itself did not specifically present such application.
Summary of this case from Matter of Rosenthal v. HarwoodOpinion
Argued July 6, 1971
Decided July 7, 1971
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, DANIEL G. ALBERT, J.
Alan Manning Miller and Henry W. Schober for appellants.
George C. Pratt and John P. Cleary for intervenors-appellants. Eugene J. McMahon, Louis Orfan and Aaron Britvan for respondents.
Order reversed, without costs, on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division, and case remitted to Special Term with directions to grant judgment declaring the rules in question to be constitutionally valid.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL and GIBSON. Judge JASEN dissents and votes to affirm on the opinion at the Appellate Division.