From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Wonsor

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 8, 1974
319 N.E.2d 710 (N.Y. 1974)

Opinion

Argued September 9, 1974

Decided October 8, 1974

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, JOSEPH C. DI CARLO, J.

Adrian P. Burke, Corporation Counsel ( Leonard Koerner and Milton H. Harris of counsel), for appellant.

Wendy Sue Lauring, Charles Schinitsky and William E. Hellerstein for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. The order appealed from should be affirmed. At the hearing, respondent corroborated rather than contradicted petitioner's evidence. This posture accounts in part for the present state of the record, which is too sparse and undeveloped to properly present the substantive issue tendered in this unduly delayed appeal.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN, STEVENS and WITMER concur.

Designated pursuant to section 2 of article VI of the State Constitution.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Wonsor

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 8, 1974
319 N.E.2d 710 (N.Y. 1974)
Case details for

Matter of Wonsor

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DIANE WONSOR, A Person Alleged to be A Physically…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 8, 1974

Citations

319 N.E.2d 710 (N.Y. 1974)
319 N.E.2d 710
361 N.Y.S.2d 350

Citing Cases

Matter of Stein

The alleged constitutional infirmities to the imposition of maintenance costs were rejected in both Claire…

Matter of Richard

The father's ability to provide for the child's maintenance was stipulated to at the hearing. Where the needs…