From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wingate v. Kron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 1998
253 A.D.2d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 28, 1998


Application by the petitioner for poor person relief and the assignment of counsel.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding and the application, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the branch of the application which is for poor person relief is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" ( Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569; see, Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

Pizzuto, J.P., Joy, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wingate v. Kron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 1998
253 A.D.2d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Wingate v. Kron

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BLAKE R. WINGATE, Petitioner, v. BARRY KRON, as Justice…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 28, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 512