From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Willie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 15, 1994
206 A.D.2d 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 15, 1994

Appeal from the Onondaga County Family Court, Hedges, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: On or about April 12, 1988, Willie W. was found to be a neglected child and was placed in the care and custody of the Onondaga County Department of Social Services (DSS), and his placement was extended by Family Court periodically. On December 9, 1991, DSS filed a petition to terminate the parental rights of respondent pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b on the ground that Willie W. was permanently neglected. On April 14, 1992, respondent, in the presence of counsel, admitted the allegations of neglect and consented to the entry of a suspended judgment requiring her to comply with 14 conditions for a period of nine months in order for her to be reunited with Willie W.

On October 1, 1992, respondent filed a petition alleging that she had complied with the 14 conditions and seeking the return of Willie W. to her. Subsequently, DSS filed a petition to extend placement alleging that respondent failed to comply with two of the conditions in the suspended judgment.

The court conducted a hearing, determined that respondent failed to sustain the allegations in her petition, "lifted" the order suspending judgment, terminated respondent's parental rights and committed Willie W. to the care and custody of DSS.

The court did not err in placing the burden of proof on respondent to prove the allegation in her petition that she had complied with the conditions in the suspended judgment (see, 57 N Y Jur 2d, Evidence and Witnesses, §§ 164-165; Richardson, Evidence § 100 [Prince 10th ed]; see also, People ex rel. New York Cent. Hudson Riv. R.R. Co. v. Public Serv. Commn., 159 App. Div. 546, 552, affd 215 N.Y. 241). Additionally, the evidence adduced at the hearing supports the court's determination that, based upon the evidence proffered by DSS, respondent did not comply with conditions five and 14 in the suspended judgment (see, Matter of Lawrence Clinton S., 186 A.D.2d 808).


Summaries of

Matter of Willie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 15, 1994
206 A.D.2d 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Willie

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIE W., an Infant. CATHERINE W., Appellant; ONONDAGA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 15, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 854

Citing Cases

Matter of Willie W

Decided December 1, 1994 Appeal from (4th Dept: 206 A.D.2d 868) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…

Matter of Jonathan B.

NN., 284 AD2d 595, 596, lv denied 96 NY2d 722), the statute and rule provide no procedural mechanism for the…