From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Williams v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 24, 1997
238 A.D.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 24, 1997


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

After a hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting assault on staff, refusing a direct order, refusing a search, being out of place and possession of a weapon, controlled substance and an altered item. Upon modification by respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services, the penalty imposed was 540 days of confinement to the special housing unit with commensurate loss of certain privileges and 18 months' loss of good time. Thereafter, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination. We find no merit to the proceeding.

First, the four misbehavior reports and corroborating testimony of various eyewitness correction officers constituted substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see, Matter of James v. Coombe, 234 A.D.2d 848. Any inconsistencies between the testimony of petitioner and/or the correction officers merely created a credibility issue which the Hearing Officer could properly resolve against petitioner ( see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966; Matter of Hardy v. Coombe, 234 A.D.2d 830). Petitioner presented no evidence to support his assertion that the Hearing Officer's assessment of credibility was arbitrary and capricious and made without regard to the facts; to the contrary, the Hearing Officer resolved the credibility issues against petitioner after expressly referencing the disparity in the evidence. Finally, petitioner has failed to prove any bias of the Hearing Officer ( see, Matter of Robles v. Coombe, 234 A.D.2d 847 or that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the alleged bias ( see, Matter of Nieves v. Coughlin, 157 A.D.2d 943). Accordingly, we confirm.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Williams v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 24, 1997
238 A.D.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Williams v. Coombe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KEVIN WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. PHILIP COOMBE, JR., as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 363

Citing Cases

Matter of Williams v. Coombe

Decided September 11, 1997 Appeal from 3d Dept: 238 A.D.2d 809 MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO…

Matter of Rucano v. Goord

The misbehavior report, written by the correction officer who was the victim of the assault, indicates that…