From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Vilord v. Village of Suffern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 19, 1951
278 App. Div. 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

September 19, 1951.

Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.


Claimant is the chief of police in Suffern. In times of heavy traffic activity he occasionally did traffic duty, but this was not part of his regular work. On March 27, 1948, while he was strenuously directing traffic, he sustained a heart attack which disabled him. There is medical proof that the attack was associated with the strain of added physical activity; there is other medical proof that there was no such association. The board accepted the proof of nonassociation and dismissed the claim. That this may seem inconsistent with what the board has done in other cases offers no sufficient basis for judicial relief. ( Matter of McSweeney v. Hammerlund Mfg. Co., 275 App. Div. 447, 450.) Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Vilord v. Village of Suffern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 19, 1951
278 App. Div. 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Matter of Vilord v. Village of Suffern

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOSEPH A. VILORD, Appellant, against VILLAGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 19, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)