From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Vil. of Hud. Falls v. N.Y. St. Dept., Envtl

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 9, 1991
77 N.Y.2d 983 (N.Y. 1991)

Opinion

Argued March 19, 1991

Decided May 9, 1991

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Lawrence E. Kahn, J.

Lewis B. Oliver and Harriet B. Oliver for appellants.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Francis J. Keehan, O. Peter Sherwood, Peter H. Schiff and Douglas H. Ward, of counsel), for respondents.

Benjamin R. Pratt, Jr., and Jeffrey J. Friedland for intervenors-respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Leonard A. Weiss at the Appellate Division ( 158 A.D.2d 24).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

Matter of Vil. of Hud. Falls v. N.Y. St. Dept., Envtl

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 9, 1991
77 N.Y.2d 983 (N.Y. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Vil. of Hud. Falls v. N.Y. St. Dept., Envtl

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of VILLAGE OF HUDSON FALLS et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 9, 1991

Citations

77 N.Y.2d 983 (N.Y. 1991)
571 N.Y.S.2d 908
575 N.E.2d 394

Citing Cases

Winner v. Cuomo

And, as this is a question of deadline, not one of the adequacy of itemization or specificity in the budget…

U.S. v. Empire State

ent to the site of the proposed project, his drinking water supply will be affected by the project, and he…