From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Van Demark v. Van Demark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 23, 1988
144 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

November 23, 1988

Appeal from the Family Court of Ulster County (Kane, J.).


In October 1986, respondent was found by Family Court to have willfully violated a May 1986 support order. The court thus ordered respondent to pay $20 per week in support of his wife and two infant children, and further ordered that if respondent missed future payments he would be committed to jail. On January 26, 1987, petitioner filed the instant petition alleging that during the approximately three-month period since the October 1986 order, respondent had paid only $80 toward his support obligations. Hearings ensued before a Hearing Examiner and then Family Court. Respondent was found in willful violation of the support order and committed to the Ulster County Jail for 40 consecutive weekends. This appeal followed.

Respondent contends that there was inadequate evidence to support a finding of a willful violation of the support order. At his hearing before Family Court, respondent acknowledged his failure to comply with the support order. This was prima facie evidence of a willful violation (see, Family Ct Act § 454 [a]; Matter of Rosa v. Borowski, 101 A.D.2d 668). Respondent was afforded ample opportunity at the hearing to explain his reasons for noncompliance. Family Court found the excuses offered by respondent unconvincing. Upon review of the record, we see no reason to disturb the court's determination. Accordingly, the order should be affirmed.

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Van Demark v. Van Demark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 23, 1988
144 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Van Demark v. Van Demark

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOANNE VAN DEMARK, Respondent, v. JAMES VAN DEMARK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 23, 1988

Citations

144 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Owens v. Blackburn. No. 1

That is fairly to be implied from the allegation that he was compelled to pay it. The three makers were…

Matter of Reynolds v. Oster

Moreover, petitioner also testified that in August 1988 he opened a small deli-bakeshop with his current…