From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Upcraft v. Tesoriero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 15, 1994
206 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 15, 1994

Appeal from the Oswego County Family Court, Elliott, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Oswego County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Family Court found modification of respondent's child support obligation appropriate but refused to apply the Child Support Standards Act (CSSA) without setting forth its reasons for refusing to do so. That was error (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [g]). Thus, we vacate that part of the order appealed from setting the amount of child support. Upon remittitur, the court must either set forth its reasons for refusing to apply the CSSA or apply the CSSA. If the court refuses to apply the CSSA, it must set an amount of child support that is appropriate in light of the reasons given.


Summaries of

Matter of Upcraft v. Tesoriero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 15, 1994
206 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Upcraft v. Tesoriero

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DEBORAH L. UPCRAFT, Also Known as DEBORAH L. ALLEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 15, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 304