From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tucker

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
May 1, 1899
27 Misc. 616 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1899)

Opinion

May, 1899.

William W. Buckley, for executor petitioner.

E.G. Levy, for comptroller.


The decedent died in August, 1892, leaving a will by which he gave a life interest in certain of his personalty to a daughter, with power to dispose of the remainder therein. She died in 1899, leaving a will by which she exercised the power in favor of persons included in the 1 per cent. class, under the Transfer Tax Law. On the appraisal, made in 1893, after the death of the grantor of the power, the principal of the fund passing to said daughter, was appraised at $22,981.32, her life estate therein at about $22,000, and the remainder at $5,691. This remainder was not taxed, as it could not then be determined to whom it would pass or whether it was subject to tax. A petition is now presented asking the court to assess the tax on the transfer effected by the execution of said power, on the basis of 1 per cent. of $5,691. This is not the proper basis. Chapter 284 of the Laws of 1897, among other changes, added a subdivision (No. 5) to section 220 of chapter 908 of the Laws of 1896. This subdivision provides, in part, as follows: "Whenever any person or corporation shall exercise a power of appointment derived from any disposition of property made either before or after the passage of this act, such appointment when made shall be deemed a transfer taxable under the provisions of this act in the same manner as though the property to which such appointment relates belonged absolutely to the donee of such power and had been bequeathed or devised by such donee by will." Under this provision it is clear that the tax on the transfer under the power in question must be assessed on the value of the whole property passing under it, and not merely on the value of the remainder as heretofore appraised. If the value of the fund has been affected since the appraisal in 1893, that fact should be established by competent proof, and, if necessary, a new appraisal be made. The present application is denied, without prejudice to a renewal thereof on compliance with the practice suggested.

Application denied without prejudice to a renewal thereof.


Summaries of

Matter of Tucker

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
May 1, 1899
27 Misc. 616 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1899)
Case details for

Matter of Tucker

Case Details

Full title:Matter of the Appraisal of the Property of JOHN C. TUCKER, Deceased, Under…

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: May 1, 1899

Citations

27 Misc. 616 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1899)
59 N.Y.S. 699

Citing Cases

Matter of Coster

Orr v. Gilman, 183 U.S. 278); Matter of Pell ( 171 N.Y. 48); Matter of Lansing (182 id. 238). Many reasons…