From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v. Surles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 1993
189 A.D.2d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

January 11, 1993


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner failed to sustain its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the establishment of the proposed community residence facility would result in both an overconcentration of similar facilities in the area and a substantial alteration of the nature and character of the community (see, Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34 [c] [5]; Matter of Town of Hempstead v. Commissioner of the State of N.Y. Off. of Mental Health, 166 A.D.2d 709). We also find that the Commissioner's determination was supported by substantial evidence (see, CPLR 7803). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Bracken and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v. Surles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 1993
189 A.D.2d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v. Surles

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, Petitioner, v. RICHARD C. SURLES, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 11, 1993

Citations

189 A.D.2d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Citing Cases

William Ct. v. Mental Retardation

For an objectant to successfully prevail in a CPLR article 78 proceeding, it is necessary to show by…

Matter of Hempstead v. Commissioner of the St.

In assessing the need for the facility within the municipality, the Commissioner properly considered the need…