From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tinnelly v. Schrumpf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 29, 1951
278 App. Div. 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

June 29, 1951.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board.

Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Deyo, Bergan and Coon, JJ.


The employer stated they had been "jointly hired". Their compensation was a reduction of rent on their apartment. Claimant testified, and it is undisputed in the record, that either she or her husband were required to be in the building all the time. The record shows claimant did little or no actual physical work, this being done by members of her family. Even so, her presence in the building while she continued in the relation of joint superintendent placed her in the employment while she was there, and her fall on the premises at night was in the course of employment. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Tinnelly v. Schrumpf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 29, 1951
278 App. Div. 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Matter of Tinnelly v. Schrumpf

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of KATHERINE TINNELLY, Respondent, against…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)