From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of the Marriage of Hooker

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 1, 1977
564 P.2d 1078 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-1837, CA 7073

Argued May 2, 1977

Affirmed June 1, 1977

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County.

Douglas R. Spencer, Judge.

Kenneth A. Morrow, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Morrow McCrea, P.C., Eugene.

Hector E. Smith, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Richardson, Judges.


Affirmed. Costs to neither party.

SCHWAB, C. J.


In this dissolution-of-marriage proceeding, the father appeals from the court's award to mother of custody of the parties' two children — a girl aged 7, and a boy aged 2.

Nothing would be gained by detailing the facts, both favorable and unfavorable to each party. Sarty v. Forney, 12 Or. App. 251, 506 P.2d 535 (1973). Both parties have strengths and weaknesses as custodial parents, and neither is unfit to have custody. The trial court had the opportunity to listen to the testimony of and observe both. In a close case such as this we are reluctant to disturb the trial court's order — Rea v. Rea, 195 Or. 252, 245 P.2d 884 (1952); Starin and Starin, 29 Or. App. 557, 564 P.2d 748 (1977) — particularly when modification can be later considered should the mother's improved relationship with her daughter deteriorate, or should the mother engage in acts of violence toward either child.

Affirmed. Costs to neither party.


Summaries of

Matter of the Marriage of Hooker

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 1, 1977
564 P.2d 1078 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Matter of the Marriage of Hooker

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Marriage of HOOKER, Respondent, and HOOKER, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 1, 1977

Citations

564 P.2d 1078 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)
564 P.2d 1078

Citing Cases

Matter of the Marriage of Scott

In child custody cases, more than in any other area of domestic relations law, the conclusions of the trial…