From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of the Claim of Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 25, 2003
308 A.D.2d 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93700

Decided and Entered: September 25, 2003.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 10, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Stacey L. Wilson, Patachogue, appellant pro se.

Putney, Twombly, Hall Hirson L.L.P., New York City (Mark A. Hernandez of counsel), for Suffolk County Water Authority, respondent.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Mary Hughes of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Claimant left her employment as a clerk for a municipal water authority after claimant's mother-in-law informed her that she would no longer babysit claimant's three children. The record establishes that claimant failed to request a leave of absence in order to make a more diligent effort in searching for acceptable child care. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause (see Matter of Vitale [Commissioner of Labor], 263 A.D.2d 758; Matter of Monreale [Commissioner of Labor], 249 A.D.2d 620).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of the Claim of Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 25, 2003
308 A.D.2d 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Matter of the Claim of Wilson

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF STACEY L. WILSON, Appellant. SUFFOLK COUNTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 25, 2003

Citations

308 A.D.2d 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
764 N.Y.S.2d 661

Citing Cases

Prohealth Care Assocs, L.L.P. v. Shapiro

The distinction between being "marked off and "marked abandoned" is critical because of the automatic…

Mtr. of the Claim of Monika

She failed, however, to respond to the employer's letter notifying her that she would be deemed to have…