From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of the Claim of Turley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 18, 2002
296 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

91332

July 18, 2002.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 29, 2001, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Ulysses Turley Jr., Buffalo, appellant pro se.

Gibson, McAskill Crosby L.L.P., Buffalo (Robert E. Scott of counsel), for American Axle Manufacturing Inc., respondent.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Steven Segall of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

As a result of his conviction of driving while intoxicated, claimant was incarcerated in January 2000 and unable to report to his job as a machinist until he was released in August 2000. While claimant was in jail, his employer granted him two leaves of absence, but refused to grant him extended leave beyond April 10, 2000. Consequently, claimant was terminated from his position. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied claimant's application for unemployment insurance benefits, ruling that he was disqualified from receiving benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. After granting claimant's request for reconsideration, the Board adhered to its prior decision.

We affirm. This Court has held that a claimant's unavailability for employment due to incarceration for an alcohol-related offense constitutes misconduct disqualifying the claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see, Matter of Matyjczuk [Delphi Automotive Sys. Div. of Gen. Motors Corp. — Commissioner of Labor], 262 A.D.2d 847, 848; Matter of Opoka [Sweeney], 232 A.D.2d 718, 719). Inasmuch as it is undisputed that claimant was unable to report to work because of his incarceration, substantial evidence supports the Board's decision.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of the Claim of Turley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 18, 2002
296 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Matter of the Claim of Turley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ULYSSES TURLEY JR., Appellant. AMERICAN AXLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 18, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
744 N.Y.S.2d 775

Citing Cases

Stack v. City of Glens Falls

Notably, possession of a valid driver's license was not listed among the qualifications necessary to hold the…

In the Matter of Claim of Richardson

We affirm. A claimant who is absent from work due to incarceration has been held disqualified from receiving…