Opinion
June 18, 1998
Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
Claimant was receiving unemployment insurance benefits while he was employed of counsel to a law firm and also teaching a college course. When he applied for benefits, he inaccurately reported his work at the law firm and failed to disclose the teaching position. In a decision filed and mailed to claimant on February 11, 1997, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he was not totally unemployed and found that he willfully misrepresented his unemployment. In a subsequent decision, the Board assessed claimant with a recoverable overpayment of benefits. With regard to the timeliness of claimant's appeal from the Board's February 11, 1997 decision, claimant asserts that he relocated while his claim for benefits was pending and did not receive the decision until it was remailed to his correct address on March 12, 1997. Even assuming that claimant's time to appeal could be measured from the date the decision was remailed, however, his appeal was not filed until May 10, 1997 and must therefore be dismissed as untimely ( see, Labor Law § 624 Lab.; Matter of Linderman [Hudacs], 207 A.D.2d 929). In any event, were we to address the merits, we would conclude that the Board's finding of willful misrepresentation is supported by substantial evidence ( see, Matter of Le Pore [Sweeney], 248 A.D.2d 783; Matter of Silverstein [Sweeney], 236 A.D.2d 757). Finally, our review of the record reveals no error in the Board's July 22, 1997 decision assessing claimant a recoverable overpayment of $975.
Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the appeal from the decision filed February 11, 1997 is dismissed.
Ordered that the decision filed July 22, 1997 is affirmed, without costs.