From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Testa v. Valenza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1987
133 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

September 30, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Petition unanimously dismissed on the law without costs. Memorandum: This court lacks jurisdiction to review petitioner's termination as a county attorney because, as an exempt employee, he had no right to a hearing (Civil Service Law § 75). Petitioner's attempt to challenge his change in status from a classified to an exempt position, which occurred in May 1985, is time barred (CPLR 217). Petitioner was afforded a hearing in the event it was later determined that he was entitled to a name-clearing hearing (see, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564). Since petitioner failed to establish that his employer publicly disseminated the charges against petitioner, he was not entitled to a name-clearing hearing (Matter of Lentlie v. Egan, 61 N.Y.2d 874, 876; Matter of Lyles v. Ravitch, 101 A.D.2d 862, 863). Were we to reach the merits of the petition, we would find that there is substantial evidence to support the determination dismissing the petition.


Summaries of

Matter of Testa v. Valenza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1987
133 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Testa v. Valenza

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHARLES R. TESTA, Petitioner, v. CHARLES R. VALENZA, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1987

Citations

133 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)