From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tessler v. Hammons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 1998
251 A.D.2d 63 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 9, 1998


Respondents determination that petitioners non-compliance with the Work Experience Program (WEP) was willful and without good cause was supported by substantial evidence. The record discloses that petitioner, a WEP participant on two prior occasions, admitted that he received the work appointment notice requesting his appearance at the Office of Employment Services on September 17, 1996 for a work assignment assessment, but failed to call or visit the office, even after he realized at or near the appointment date that he had "misplaced" the appointment notice ( see, Matter of Bonilla v. New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 219 A.D.2d 526, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 807).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Tessler v. Hammons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 1998
251 A.D.2d 63 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Tessler v. Hammons

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL TESSLER, Petitioner, v. MARVA HAMMONS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 63 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
674 N.Y.S.2d 299

Citing Cases

In re Application of Cruz v. Wing

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli, Wallach, JJ. Petitioner's public assistance…

Castro v. Department of Social Servs.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ. There was substantial evidence to support…