From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Taylor v. McNab

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 2, 1976
355 N.E.2d 789 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued September 1, 1976

Decided September 2, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, GEORGE J. ASPLAND, J.

Gloria May Rosenblum and Robert E. Brink for appellant.

Donald W. Leo and Stephen Schapiro for respondent.


Having granted leave to appeal in this case in the accelerated procedure required in some election cases the court sua sponte has reconsidered such determination and on such reconsideration recalls its prior determination and denies the application for leave to appeal.

It now appears that the record in this case is insufficient to permit an informed judicial resolution of the important issues tendered for determination. Further, in view of the practical constraints of time before the primary elections on September 14, 1976, the court is satisfied that there can be no adequate opportunity appropriately to supplement the record and to obtain a final judicial disposition.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in Per Curiam opinion.

On reconsideration, order granting leave to appeal recalled and motion for leave to appeal denied.


Summaries of

Matter of Taylor v. McNab

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 2, 1976
355 N.E.2d 789 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Taylor v. McNab

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARTIN TAYLOR, Appellant, v. EVERETT F. McNAB et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 2, 1976

Citations

355 N.E.2d 789 (N.Y. 1976)
355 N.E.2d 789
387 N.Y.S.2d 560

Citing Cases

Matter of Bush v. Salerno

It follows that the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the petition should be dismissed,…

Matter of Reiter v. Black

Having granted leave to appeal in this case in the accelerated procedure required in some election cases the…