From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Suede Pillow Novelty Co. Inc., v. Dworsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 1937
250 App. Div. 48 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

February 26, 1937.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

Sydney Krause of counsel [ Krause, Hirsch Levin, attorneys], for the appellants.

Maxwell P. Reckseit of counsel [ Sidney Lipston, attorney], for the respondent.

Present — MARTIN, P.J., McAVOY, O'MALLEY, TOWNLEY and COHN, JJ.


The sole question for the learned official referee was: Are any additional moneys due Dworskys over the agreed sum of $266.08? If so, may they hold the collateral for their payment, in addition to such agreed sum? The referee upheld the Dworskys as to both items claimed as further fees for collection and counsel fee, in his report. The court confirmed the report. Nevertheless the order entered thereon was not conformable to the decision. It provided that the appellants be directed to turn over the collateral accounts receivable upon a payment which did not include the sums the referee found due to appellants. It makes no provision for payment of the only items contested before the referee and on both of which he found in appellant's favor.

The order entered July 2, 1936, should be modified by conforming same to the referee's report, and as so modified affirmed, and the order denying the motion to resettle said order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants.


Order entered July 2, 1936, unanimously modified by conforming same to the referee's report, and as so modified affirmed, and the order denying the motion to resettle said order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Matter of Suede Pillow Novelty Co. Inc., v. Dworsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 1937
250 App. Div. 48 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Matter of Suede Pillow Novelty Co. Inc., v. Dworsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of SUEDE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 26, 1937

Citations

250 App. Div. 48 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
293 N.Y.S. 853

Citing Cases

Long Is. Light. Co. v. Lambert

Resettlement of an order is a procedure of clarification or correction, not to modify or change the relief…