Summary
In Matter of Straus v. Power (22 N.Y.2d 886), decided September 26, 1968, the significant circumstance warranting a different result is that the respondent successful candidate in that case submitted proof, explaining discrepancies inter alia through the testimony of registered voters who testified to signing in but not voting in the contested primary.
Summary of this case from Matter of Ippolito v. PowerOpinion
Argued September 25, 1968
Decided September 26, 1968
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, HYMAN KORN, J.
David Levy for appellant.
James J. Leff for respondent.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.