Opinion
Argued October 6, 1942
Decided December 3, 1942
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
Harry Wareham and Frank L. Ward for appellants.
Albert Orenstein for respondent.
At any time before final payment to a claimant of a settlement agreed upon following a factual controversy between the carrier and claimant, the department may make such decision or order in the premises as in its judgment is just and proper including one disapproving payment of the unpaid balance of the settlement. (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 123 [Cons. Laws, ch. 67]; Matter of Whitmyre v. International Business Machine Corp., 274 N.Y. 61.)
Matter of Miller ( 227 App. Div. 675, affd., 253 N.Y. 541) is not in conflict. There a widow obtained an award for the death of her husband and thereafter died. Her administratrix sought payment to her estate of the amount of the award unpaid at the time of her death. Clearly the right of the widow to the award had vested in her and no limitation of Workmen's Compensation Law, section 123, was intended or effected by the decision.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the decision of the State Industrial Board affirmed without costs.
LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.