Opinion
November 1, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.).
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs to the petitioner-respondent.
We find that the court's determination that the appellant was not involved in a "hit and run" accident is not against the weight of the evidence (see, Matter of Henderson v MVAIC, 112 A.D.2d 228; Matter of Crum Forster Ins. Cos. [Formisano], 76 A.D.2d 864).
The appellant's remaining contentions regarding the court's evidentiary rulings are either without merit or harmless error under the facts of this case (see, Forrester v Port Auth., 166 A.D.2d 181). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Eiber, O'Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.