Summary
In Sperling (supra), the court considered the petitioner's article 78 proceeding to amend the jail records by crediting him with 421 days jail time, but rejected his application — not because the proceeding was not maintainable as an article 78 proceeding — but because on the merits he was not entitled to credit for the time he sought.
Summary of this case from Matter of Browne v. N.Y.S. Bd. of ParoleOpinion
May 8, 1950.
Present — Johnston, Acting P.J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
Order dismissing petition of appellant for an order directing the Board of Parole to certify, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 2193 of the Penal Law, that petitioner has spent 421 days in prison, etc., unanimously affirmed. No opinion.