From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Smith v. N.Y. City Empl. Retire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 18, 1995
215 A.D.2d 256 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 18, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.).


Respondents' determination that the injury petitioner sustained to his shoulder and back when, in the course of his employment with the New York City Parks Department, he lifted a wheelbarrow into a dump truck, was not the result of an unexpected event, and thus not an "accident" within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 605 (b) (3), was not arbitrary and capricious (see, Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees, 57 N.Y.2d 1010; Matter of Danyi v Board of Trustees, 176 A.D.2d 451).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Smith v. N.Y. City Empl. Retire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 18, 1995
215 A.D.2d 256 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Smith v. N.Y. City Empl. Retire

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES V. SMITH, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 18, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 256 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 200

Citing Cases

Matter of White v. Kelly

An injury, such as White's, which is incurred while lifting, pushing or reaching does not qualify an…

In Matter of Savallo v. Kelly

Given these precedents, petitioner's back injury, which was caused by his exertion when moving tables, is…