From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Smith

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, Queens County
Dec 22, 1931
143 Misc. 653 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1931)

Opinion

December 22, 1931

Clinton M. Fling, for the administrator.

George Morton Levy and Leo Fishel for Blanche Smith Muldowney and Priscilla M. Germond, objectors.


In this accounting proceeding Blanche Smith Muldowney and Priscilla M. Germond object to the payment to the administrator individually of certain legacies left to them under the will of the decedent and which the administrator claims by virtue of assignments alleged to have been executed by them. In their objections they claim that the assignments were procured by fraud and without consideration, and at a time when both of them were under twenty-one years of age. They now move for a jury trial of the issues raised by their objections. The objectors in endeavoring to set aside the assignments are seeking equitable relief. Actions of this character have uniformly been tried at Special Term without a jury. At least, there is no constitutional right to a jury trial of the objections. ( Matter of Stark, 118 Misc. 240; Matter of Beare, 122 id. 519; affd., 214 A.D. 723; Matter of Boyle, 242 N.Y. 342.) While the surrogate may, as a matter of discretion, order a jury trial, I am not inclined to do so in this case. Application denied. Submit order accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Smith

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, Queens County
Dec 22, 1931
143 Misc. 653 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1931)
Case details for

Matter of Smith

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of JAMES R. SMITH, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, Queens County

Date published: Dec 22, 1931

Citations

143 Misc. 653 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1931)
257 N.Y.S. 858

Citing Cases

In re the Estate of Heim

In the ordinary case, one holding a claim against an estate possesses a right to a jury trial which may not…