From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sloate v. Rochester Taxicab Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 8, 1917
116 N.E. 1076 (N.Y. 1917)

Opinion

Argued April 19, 1917

Decided May 8, 1917

William Butler for appellants.

Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Not voting: HOGAN, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Sloate v. Rochester Taxicab Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 8, 1917
116 N.E. 1076 (N.Y. 1917)
Case details for

Matter of Sloate v. Rochester Taxicab Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MAUDE J. SLOATE et al., Respondents, against…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 8, 1917

Citations

116 N.E. 1076 (N.Y. 1917)
116 N.E. 1076

Citing Cases

Begendorf v. Swift Co., Inc.

In such cases the compensation paid by the employers is correspondingly less and they are, therefore,…

Weinberg v. D-M Rest. Corp.

The ruling of the lower courts that the acceptance by the checkroom attendant of a gratuity in which the…