From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Slawinski v. J.H. Williams Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 16, 1948
81 N.E.2d 93 (N.Y. 1948)

Summary

In Slawinski the sole dissenter at the Appellate Division took, and the Appellate Division majority rejected, the same position taken by respondents here: that claimant although physically and occupationally impaired was not "disabled" because he lost no time or wages.

Summary of this case from Matter of Ryciak v. Eastern Precision

Opinion

Argued June 10, 1948

Decided July 16, 1948

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Noel S. Symons for appellants.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Gilbert M. Landy and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ. Taking no part: CONWAY, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Slawinski v. J.H. Williams Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 16, 1948
81 N.E.2d 93 (N.Y. 1948)

In Slawinski the sole dissenter at the Appellate Division took, and the Appellate Division majority rejected, the same position taken by respondents here: that claimant although physically and occupationally impaired was not "disabled" because he lost no time or wages.

Summary of this case from Matter of Ryciak v. Eastern Precision
Case details for

Matter of Slawinski v. J.H. Williams Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MATTHEW SLAWINSKI, Respondent, against J.H…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 16, 1948

Citations

81 N.E.2d 93 (N.Y. 1948)
81 N.E.2d 93

Citing Cases

Matter of Gormeley v. N.Y. Daily News

It is readily apparent that this claimant has been in no way adversely affected by article 3-A except as he…

Miller v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.

Although Amalgamated, both here and before the Commission, argued that a gradual loss of hearing does not…