Matter of Sinceno v. Riley

Full title: In the Matter of TYRONE SINCENO, Appellant, v. DEAN R. RILEY, Respondent

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1995

215 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

626 N.Y.S.2d 976

Opinion

May 1, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner's contentions, the dates on which he would be eligible for parole and conditional release, and the maximum expiration date of his sentence, were properly calculated in accordance with the method authorized by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Sparago v New York State Bd. of Parole ( 71 N.Y.2d 943, 945-946).

We have reviewed the petitioner's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P.J., O'Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.