From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shupack v. Dayton Towers Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 1994
203 A.D.2d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 19, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.


This proceeding, denominated an appeal, was transferred to this Court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department dated December 27, 1993. Upon our review of the record, we find that there was substantial evidence supporting the administrative findings that petitioner did not establish that she had resided in the subject apartment as a primary residence with her father for at least two years prior to his death and has appeared on income affidavits for at least two consecutive annual reporting periods immediately prior to his death and that she was therefore not entitled to rights of succession in the apartment (see, 28 RCNY 3-02 [p] [3]). The within petition must therefore be denied and the transferred proceeding dismissed.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Shupack v. Dayton Towers Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 1994
203 A.D.2d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Shupack v. Dayton Towers Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DORIS SHUPACK, Petitioner, v. DAYTON TOWERS CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 783

Citing Cases

Moore v. City of N.Y.

Respondent HPD "is vested with exclusive jurisdiction to determine the remaining-family-member claim in…

In re of Estate of Vaisman

The determination was supported by substantial evidence. The record, including inferences and assessments of…