Opinion
July 15, 1994
Appeal from the Erie County Family Court, Townsend, J.
Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Wesley and Davis, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The testimony of a police officer that respondent was in recent possession of stolen property, together with other testimony of the officer that supported an inference that respondent knew that the property was not his, is sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony that respondent engaged in conduct constituting the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (see, People v. Fort, 145 A.D.2d 983, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 1014).