From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1996
222 A.D.2d 67 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 13, 1996

Richard M. Maltz of counsel (Hal R. Lieberman, attorney), for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.


Respondent, Arthur R. Scott, Jr., was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on October 10, 1973. Respondent is a former Housing Court Judge who was assigned to Manhattan.

On February 20, 1996, respondent, pleaded guilty to grand larceny by extortion in the second degree (Penal Law § 155.40 [c]), bribe receiving in the third degree (Penal Law § 200.10), and scheme to defraud in the first degree (Penal Law § 190.65). As these crimes are all felonies under the laws of the State of New York and within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (e), respondent automatically ceased to be an attorney by operation of law upon entry of his guilty plea ( Matter of Kourland, 172 A.D.2d 77, 79).

Accordingly, the petition is granted and respondent's name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b).

SULLIVAN, J.P., ROSS, NARDELLI, TOM and MAZZARELLI, JJ., concur.

Petition granted, and respondent's name directed to be struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York forthwith.


Summaries of

Matter of Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1996
222 A.D.2d 67 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Scott

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ARTHUR R. SCOTT, JR., an Attorney, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1996

Citations

222 A.D.2d 67 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 346

Citing Cases

In re Zer

The respondent was sentenced to five years' probation on February 3, 1997. By petition dated February 24,…

In re Remmelink

40 (1), and one count of grand larceny in the third degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.35. The respondent…