From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Schwartz v. Bogen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1968
238 N.E.2d 496 (N.Y. 1968)

Opinion

Argued April 9, 1968

Decided April 18, 1968

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, FRANK S. SAMANSKY, J.

J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel ( Robert E. Hugh and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for appellants.

William J. Williams for respondent.


Order modified and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs in the following memorandum: On oral argument, appellants stated that checklists, rather than standard answers, were used in rating essay parts of the examination. Therefore, the Appellate Division's order is modified to the extent of requiring appellants to furnish respondent with all materials used in determining the correctness or quality of the answers in the essay parts of the examination.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.


Summaries of

Matter of Schwartz v. Bogen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1968
238 N.E.2d 496 (N.Y. 1968)
Case details for

Matter of Schwartz v. Bogen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DOROTHY H. SCHWARTZ, Respondent, v. ISIDORE BOGEN et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 18, 1968

Citations

238 N.E.2d 496 (N.Y. 1968)
238 N.E.2d 496
291 N.Y.S.2d 4

Citing Cases

Matter of Schwartz v. Bogen

As so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. The basis of the application…

Matter of Holloway v. Bd. of Examiners of Bd.

Special Term dismissed the petition on the authority of Matter of Kropf v. Board of Educ. ( 18 A.D.2d 919)…