From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Schulze

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Feb 1, 1923
120 Misc. 287 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1923)

Opinion

February, 1923.

Geller, Rolston Blanc ( Howell D. Boyd, of counsel), for executor.

Ernest M. Morrison, for claimant.

Noble, Morgan Scammell, for Daisy E. Schulze.


On November 8, 1901, a judgment for the sum of $269.25 was entered by Frederick C. Simons against one Edward Schulze. Nothing further was done by the judgment creditor to collect the judgment except that he filed a claim against the estate of this decedent on July 9, 1921, which was rejected in writing on June 23, 1922. No payment on the judgment or acknowledgment of the indebtedness has been made since the docketing thereof. The claim now comes before the surrogate for determination upon the accounting of the executor. The filing of the claim herein did not stay the running of the statute. Matter of Hoes, 183 A.D. 38; Brinkman v. Cram, 175 id. 372. Section 44 of the Civil Practice Act extinguished the judgment on November 8, 1921, and the claim is, therefore, disallowed. Matter of Hoes, supra.

Decreed accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Schulze

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Feb 1, 1923
120 Misc. 287 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1923)
Case details for

Matter of Schulze

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of EDWARD SCHULZE, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: Feb 1, 1923

Citations

120 Misc. 287 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1923)
198 N.Y.S. 351

Citing Cases

Matter of McEnery

The mere filing of her claim on May 21, 1934, did not stay the running of the statute. ( Matter of Schulze,…

Matter of Amarante

It has repeatedly been held that this statute and its forerunners are conclusive against any right of the…