From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Saxon Industries, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Apr 21, 1983
29 B.R. 319 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Bankruptcy No. 82 B 10687.

April 21, 1983.

Burns Summit Rovins Feldesman, Cahill, Gordon Reindel, Corp. Counsel, New York City, for debtor.

Cornelius Blackshear, Acting U.S. Trustee, New York City.

Erik Aschenbrenner, New York City, for Securities and Exchange Com'n.

Shea Gould, New York City, for Creditors' Committee.

Steel, Hector Davis, Miami, Fla., Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer Woods, Local Counsel, New York City, for Examiner, Arthur England.

Milbank, Tweed, Hadley McCloy, New York City, for the Committee of Equity Security Holders.

Zalkin, Rodin Goodman, New York City, for Unofficial Committee of Bank Creditors.


DECISION AND ORDER ON ALLOWANCE OF INTERIM COMPENSATION AND ALLOWANCE OF FINAL FEE PREMIUM


On March 28, 1983 a hearing was held before this court on applications for interim compensation for professional services rendered in the Saxon Industries, Inc. case.

An order was signed on March 29, 1983 authorizing certain payments. This order left in abeyance the request of Shea Gould, as counsel to the official creditors' committee, for the payment of their allowance in full without the 25% holdback which is in the sum of $19,360.

The payment of a $30,000 "premium" to steel, Hector and Davis, counsel to the Examiner, was also left for future determination.

With respect to Shea Gould, the $19,360 holdback, if required, would blindly follow some bankruptcy judges' practice of holding back in all cases 25% of allowed interim fees. This practice may be appropriate in some cases. Absent a proper showing to the contrary, if a party objects to the holdback, this court allows payment of compensation in full. Therefore, Shea Gould is allowed $19,360.

The request of Steel, Hector Davis for the relatively modest premium of $30,000 is also granted. The exemplary performance of Steel, Hector and Davis fully warrants the award. See In re Aminex Corp., 15 B.R. 356 (Bkrtcy.S.D.N.Y. 1981) for a thorough discussion of fee premiums in bankruptcy cases.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Matter of Saxon Industries, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Apr 21, 1983
29 B.R. 319 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Matter of Saxon Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SAXON INDUSTRIES, INC., Debtor

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 21, 1983

Citations

29 B.R. 319 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1983)

Citing Cases

In re Wilson Foods Corp.

In cases where the rationale for imposing a hold back is absent the Court need not blindly follow this…

In re Public Service Co. of New Hampshire

In cases where the rationale for imposing a hold back is absent the Court need not blindly follow this…