From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Santarella v. New York City Dept. of Corr

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1981
53 N.Y.2d 948 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued April 30, 1981

Decided June 2, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, NATHANIEL T. HELMAN, J.

Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel (Pamela Seider Dolgow and Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for appellants.

Henry T. Berger and Kenneth E. Gordon for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Commissioner of Correction reinstated.

In view of the consistent pattern of misconduct as found by the hearing officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Correction, we cannot say that the penalty of dismissal is so disproportionate to petitioner's offenses as to mandate modification. (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233.) It is irrelevant that the necessary aims of discipline in the department could have been achieved by a less severe sanction.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of Santarella v. New York City Dept. of Corr

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1981
53 N.Y.2d 948 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

Matter of Santarella v. New York City Dept. of Corr

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL SANTARELLA, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 2, 1981

Citations

53 N.Y.2d 948 (N.Y. 1981)

Citing Cases

Miller v. Sise

After a hearing, it was determined that the petitioner's excessive absences and late arrivals at work were…

Matter of Wiggins v. Board of Education

As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The penalty of dismissal was not an abuse…