Opinion
January 25, 2001.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 29, 1999, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Philip P. Salerno, Valley Stream, appellant in person.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Marjorie S. Leff of counsel), New York City, for respondent.
Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Claimant, a radiation therapist, was reassigned to the hospital billing department after the radiology and oncology unit of the hospital was closed. Claimant's salary, hours and benefits did not change in his new position and he was a member of a protected status, meaning that he could not be laid off from his transferred position. Thereafter, claimant resigned in order to take advantage of a voluntary buy-out incentive retirement option, whereby he was paid a $25,000 lump sum and began receiving monthly pension payments. Claimant admits that the decision to accept the early retirement incentive was "strictly voluntary" and he was not in jeopardy of losing his job. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was not entitled to unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment in order to take part in an early retirement incentive package (see, Matter of Szumelak [Commissioner of Labor], 260 A.D.2d 884; Matter of Leung [Sweeney], 219 A.D.2d 741, 742). Furthermore, inasmuch as there is no dispute that the employer fully funded his pension, claimant's benefit rate was properly reduced (see, Labor Law § 600).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.