Opinion
February 10, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Clinton County (Feldstein, J.).
We reject petitioner's contention that because the disciplinary proceeding was commenced more than seven days after his restrictive confinement, the time limitations of 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 (a) were violated. The record shows that the extension was timely requested and granted, and that the hearing was also timely completed. We also find, contrary to petitioner's contention, that the misbehavior report provided adequate notice of the charges against him. Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.