Rutgers v. Rutgers Council of AAUP Chapters

Full title: IN THE MATTER OF RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, v…

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 2, 1993

618 A.2d 853 (N.J. 1993)

618 A.2d 853

Opinion

Argued January 19, 1993 —

Decided February 2, 1993.

Before WILENTZ, C.J., and CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN, JJ.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Paul Schachter argued the cause for appellant ( Reinhardt Schachter, attorneys).

Robert E. Anderson, General Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Public Employment Relations Commission. John B. Wolf argued the cause for respondent Rutgers, The State University.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 256 N.J. Super. 104, 606 A.2d 822 (1992).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

For reversal — None.